Effect of Statins on Venous Thromboembolic Events: A Meta-analysis of Published and Unpublished Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials

نویسندگان

  • Kazem Rahimi
  • Neeraj Bhala
  • Pieter Kamphuisen
  • Jonathan Emberson
  • Sara Biere-Rafi
  • Vera Krane
  • Michele Robertson
  • John Wikstrand
  • John McMurray
چکیده

BACKGROUND It has been suggested that statins substantially reduce the risk of venous thromboembolic events. We sought to test this hypothesis by performing a meta-analysis of both published and unpublished results from randomised trials of statins. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to March 2012 for randomised controlled trials comparing statin with no statin, or comparing high dose versus standard dose statin, with 100 or more randomised participants and at least 6 months' follow-up. Investigators were contacted for unpublished information about venous thromboembolic events during follow-up. Twenty-two trials of statin versus control (105,759 participants) and seven trials of an intensive versus a standard dose statin regimen (40,594 participants) were included. In trials of statin versus control, allocation to statin therapy did not significantly reduce the risk of venous thromboembolic events (465 [0.9%] statin versus 521 [1.0%] control, odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% CI 0.78-1.01, p = 0.08) with no evidence of heterogeneity between effects on deep vein thrombosis (266 versus 311, OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-1.01) and effects on pulmonary embolism (205 versus 222, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.12). Exclusion of the trial result that provided the motivation for our meta-analysis (JUPITER) had little impact on the findings for venous thromboembolic events (431 [0.9%] versus 461 [1.0%], OR = 0.93 [95% CI 0.82-1.07], p = 0.32 among the other 21 trials). There was no evidence that higher dose statin therapy reduced the risk of venous thromboembolic events compared with standard dose statin therapy (198 [1.0%] versus 202 [1.0%], OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.80-1.20, p = 0.87). Risk of bias overall was small but a certain degree of effect underestimation due to random error cannot be ruled out. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this meta-analysis do not support the previous suggestion of a large protective effect of statins (or higher dose statins) on venous thromboembolic events. However, a more moderate reduction in risk up to about one-fifth cannot be ruled out.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Effect of statins on atrial fibrillation: collaborative meta-analysis of published and unpublished evidence from randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE To examine whether statins can reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation. DESIGN Meta-analysis of published and unpublished results from larger scale statin trials, with comparison of the findings against the published results from smaller scale or shorter duration studies. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane's CENTRAL up to October 2010. Unpublished data from longer term tria...

متن کامل

Statins and prevention of infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from large randomised placebo controlled trials

OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the potential of statins to lower the risk of infections as published in observational studies is causal. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION Randomised placebo controlled trials of statins (up to 10 March 2011) enrolling a minimum of 100 pa...

متن کامل

Efficacy of Prasaplai for Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea: a Meta-Analysis

Prasaplai is used in Thai traditional medicine for treatment of primary dysmenorrhea; however, clinical evidence is limited regarding the efficacy of Prasaplai for primary dysmenorrheal outcomes. This study has constituted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate Prasaplai as an effective treatment for primary dysmenorrhea. Randomized controlled trials were retrieved and identified thr...

متن کامل

Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolic events in women taking progestin-only contraception: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolic events associated with the use of progestin-only contraception and whether that risk differs with the mode of drug delivery (oral, intrauterine, or depot injection). DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. DATA SOURCES Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and reference lists o...

متن کامل

Industry sponsorship bias in research findings: a network meta-analysis of LDL cholesterol reduction in randomised trials of statins

OBJECTIVE To explore the risk of industry sponsorship bias in a systematically identified set of placebo controlled and active comparator trials of statins. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis. ELIGIBILITY Open label and double blind randomised controlled trials comparing one statin with another at any dose or with control (placebo, diet, or usual care) for adults with, or at...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012